Income Exploration and Behavioral Bias in Insurance Customers’ Decision-Making: A Qualitative Study at PT Asuransi BDIR
Keywords:
Behavioral Bias, Income, Insurance Decision, Customer, Qualitative ApproachAbstract
This study aims to explore the influence of income levels on behavioral bias tendencies among insurance customers in their decision-making at PT Asuransi BDIR. A qualitative approach with a case study method was employed to gain an in-depth understanding of how biases such as loss aversion, overconfidence, availability bias, and status quo bias emerge in decisions to purchase, retain, or cancel insurance policies. The informants included customers from three income categories (low, middle, and high), as well as two insurance agents and one customer service staff for source triangulation. Data collection techniques involved in-depth interviews, non-participant observation, and documentation, analyzed through thematic analysis. The findings indicate that income moderates the presence of certain behavioral biases. Low-income customers tend to exhibit defensive biases such as loss aversion and availability bias, while high-income customers are more prone to overconfidence and mental accounting. These findings highlight the need for tailored communication and education approaches based on customer behavioral characteristics. The study recommends implementing behavior-based education strategies, behavioral coaching training for agents, and psychographic segmentation to enhance communication effectiveness and policy retention.
References
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101.
Chandra, A., & Kumar, R. (2020). Factors influencing behavioral biases in emerging market investors. Journal of Behavioral Finance, 21(1), 52–65.
Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
Elvira, V., Sari, D., & Nugroho, S. (2022). The moderating role of income on behavioral biases among retail investors in Indonesia. International Journal of Economics and Business, 10(2), 45–59.
Handayani, S., Nugroho, Y., & Sari, A. (2022). Behavioral biases influencing investment decisions of life insurance investors. International Journal of Finance & Banking Studies, 11(3),
Kahneman, D., & Knetsch, J. L. (1991). The endowment effect, loss aversion, and status quo bias. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 5(1), 193–206.
Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 47(2), 263–291.
Kartini, K., & Nahda, M. (2021). Overconfidence bias in financial decision-making: Evidence from Indonesian consumers. Jurnal Keuangan dan Perbankan, 25(4), 645–659.
Kurniawan, H., & Murhadi, W. R. (2018). Behavioral bias in insurance: An Indonesian perspective. International Journal of Insurance and Risk Management, 8(2), 113–123.
Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Beverly Hills, CA: SAGE Publications.
Otoritas Jasa Keuangan (OJK). (2023). Survei Nasional Literasi dan Inklusi Keuangan 2022. Jakarta: Departemen Literasi dan Inklusi Keuangan, OJK.
Sahi, S. K., Arora, A. P., & Dhameja, N. (2013). Psychological biases in financial investment behavior: A systematic literature review. Qualitative Research in Financial Markets, 5(1), 84–122.
Sung, J., & Hanna, S. (1996). Factors related to risk tolerance. Journal of Financial Counseling and Planning, 7(1), 11–20.
Thaler, R. H. (1999). Mental accounting matters. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 12(3), 183–206.
Thaler, R. H., & Sunstein, C. R. (2008). Nudge: Improving decisions about health, wealth, and happiness. Yale University Press.
Willis, L. E. (2017). Performance-based consumer regulation. Loyola University Chicago Law Journal, 48(3), 1141–1186.